Comments for Reduce Gas Price http://reduce-gas-price.com Save Money For Cash In Your Pocket! Sun, 20 May 2012 18:06:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by ibuiltthishouse http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17236 ibuiltthishouse Sun, 20 May 2012 18:06:53 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17236 Personally, Reduction of automobile usage is not going to reduce greenhouse gases to make a difference. Besides, having an automobile is a symbol of freedom, and living in America, just about everyone has one. You would never put a halt on that. you know how many car companies would want you no longer to cease. And even most liberals would look at you crazy for raising gases at the pumps, not too many people want to walk to work these days(trust me, I do from time to time and it is 4.5 miles). Stop fooling yourself. If you want to save the enviroment, fine, then you must use the Cris Carter method of detective work, follow the rich white man. Behind every deal there is a rich white man waiting for his cut. So, you want your agendas to be passed, you have to follow the rule, by making the rich , white man more money. Here is an alternative to get your point across. We could reduce smog pollution in the U.S. by allowing any city with at least 100,000 people to start a mass transit system. There will be no subsidies given but regulations will be reduced and no taxes would be charged for the first 5 years with the exchange of using at least 5 percent biofuel by 2010 and 15 percent by 2015. Fares would have to be competitive so that all working classes could afford to use the system and 1 charter bus must be offered to another city that also has a mass transit system. Here we go: If you have a cheap transit system that is privately run and bio efficient. You take a lot less cars off the road. Promote bio fuel. Then you also make money and jobs. Capitalism and Conservation side by side. Win frickin win! People want to pay less for gas so they can go more miles for cheaper. Make it so that people will not need to buy gas as often. If you really want to save the environment, stick to growing more trees, that something anyone can appreciate. Forest D. Bynum Personally,

Reduction of automobile usage is not going to reduce greenhouse gases to make a difference. Besides, having an automobile is a symbol of freedom, and living in America, just about everyone has one. You would never place a halt on that. you know how many car companies would want you no longer to stop. And even most liberals would look at you crazy for raising gases at the pumps, not too many people want to walk to work these days(trust me, I do from time to time and it is 4.5 miles). Stop fooling yourself. If you want to save the enviroment, fine, then you must use the Cris Carter mode of detective work, follow the rich white man.

Behind every deal there is a rich white man waiting for his cut. So, you want your agendas to be passed, you have to follow the rule, by making the rich , white man more money. Here is an alternative to get your point crosswise.

We may possibly reduce smog pollution in the U.S. by allowing any city with at least 100,000 people to initiation a mass transit system. There will be no subsidies given but regulations will be reduced and no taxes would be exciting for the first 5 years with the exchange of using at least 5 percent biofuel by 2010 and 15 percent by 2015. Fares would have to be competitive so that all working classes may possibly afford to use the system and 1 charter bus must be offered to another city that also has a mass transit system.

Here we go:

If you have a cheap transit system that is privately run and bio efficient. You take a lot less cars off the road. Promote bio fuel. Then you also make money and jobs. Capitalism and Conservation side by side. Win frickin win!

People want to pay less for gas so they can go more miles for cheaper. Make it so that people will not need to buy gas as evenly.

If you really want to save the environment, stick to growing more trees, that something anyone can appreciate.
Forest D. Bynum

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by Michael http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17235 Michael Sun, 20 May 2012 18:00:37 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17235 Not a dime. If the government was serious about reducing greenhouse gases, they would allow hemp to be grown in controlled conditions. Henry Ford's 1st automobile ran on hemp oil, and it ran much better and cleaner. The fuel companies including fossil, nuclear and solar. The Report of the FCDA Europe - endorsed by Judges, Doctors & academics - reveals for the first time, the CANNABIS BIOMASS ENERGY EQUATION, which shows beyond doubt that cannabis-derived fuel, capable of providing almost all of our domestic and industrial energy requirements as well as running all of our cars without pollution, is easily a CHEAPER and safer form of viable energy. It is the huge oil and nuclear industries which have the main profit motivations for continued prohibition at any cost. The FCDA Report reveals the true motives behind both past and present prohibition, and declares the law itself illegal! Not a dime. If the government was serious about sinking greenhouse gases, they would allow hemp to be grown in controlled conditions.

Henry Ford’s 1st automobile ran on hemp oil, and it ran much better and cleaner.

The fuel companies including fossil, nuclear and solar. The Report of the FCDA Europe – endorsed by Judges, Doctors & academics – reveals for the first time, the CANNABIS BIOMASS ENERGY EQUATION, which shows beyond doubt that cannabis-derived fuel, capable of providing nearly all of our domestic and industrial energy requirements as well as running all of our cars without pollution, is easily a CHEAPER and safer form of viable energy. It is the huge oil and nuclear industries which have the main profit motivations for continued prohibition at any cost. The FCDA Report reveals the right motives behind both past and present prohibition, and declares the law itself illegal!

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by ouch http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17234 ouch Sun, 20 May 2012 17:19:34 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17234 This doesn't make any since. What does the price of gas have anything to do with reducing Greenhouse Gases? You mean if I pay more for a gallon of gas it will save the environment? This doesn’t make any since. What does the price of gas have anything to do with sinking Greenhouse Gases? You mean if I pay more for a gallon of gas it will save the environment?

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by The Hammer http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17233 The Hammer Sun, 20 May 2012 16:56:25 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17233 How much would gas cost if we put lead back in it? How much would gas cost if we place lead back in it?

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by Boxcar Joe http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17232 Boxcar Joe Sun, 20 May 2012 16:00:05 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17232 Zero. The question answers itself. :-) Zero. The question answers itself. :-)

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by subwm4bush http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17231 subwm4bush Sun, 20 May 2012 15:54:50 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17231 None, all profits should go to the corporations. None, all profits must go to the corporations.

]]> Comment on How much more would you be willing to pay for a gallon of gasoline to reduce greenhouse gases? by Libs Are Funny http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/comment-page-1/#comment-17230 Libs Are Funny Sun, 20 May 2012 15:27:02 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/how-much-more-would-you-be-willing-to-pay-for-a-gallon-of-gasoline-to-reduce-greenhouse-gases/#comment-17230 zero. i could care less. zero. i may possibly care less.

]]> Comment on Is it possible to develop technology to split carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon to reduce global warming? by JcL http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-to-develop-technology-to-split-carbon-dioxide-into-oxygen-and-carbon-to-reduce-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-17222 JcL Sun, 20 May 2012 00:28:42 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-to-develop-technology-to-split-carbon-dioxide-into-oxygen-and-carbon-to-reduce-global-warming/#comment-17222 This is what I don't understand. Plants use photosynthesis to break down CO2 and use it for energy. In the Eu and Canada, CO2 is used as an organic fertilizer to increase plant growth. So if our global CO2 level is increasing, the plant life on earth would grow faster, thus using up more CO2. So how is CO2 a problem? This is what I don’t know. Plants use photosynthesis to break down CO2 and use it for energy. In the Eu and Canada, CO2 is used as an organic fertilizer to increase plant growth. So if our global CO2 level is increasing, the plant life on earth would grow quicker, thus using up more CO2. So how is CO2 a problem?

]]> Comment on Is it possible to develop technology to split carbon dioxide into oxygen and carbon to reduce global warming? by John Terry http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-to-develop-technology-to-split-carbon-dioxide-into-oxygen-and-carbon-to-reduce-global-warming/comment-page-1/#comment-17221 John Terry Sun, 20 May 2012 00:26:10 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-to-develop-technology-to-split-carbon-dioxide-into-oxygen-and-carbon-to-reduce-global-warming/#comment-17221 You mean like photosynthesis? You mean like photosynthesis?

]]> Comment on Is it possible for the United States Government to reduce the price of gas? by mark32541 http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-for-the-united-states-government-to-reduce-the-price-of-gas/comment-page-1/#comment-17211 mark32541 Sat, 19 May 2012 09:04:30 +0000 http://reduce-gas-price.com/is-it-possible-for-the-united-states-government-to-reduce-the-price-of-gas/#comment-17211 Not really, Since 75% of all the oil refined into gasoline, has to be bough from foreign countries. And we cannot do anything at all, about the price those countries sell oil for. Not really,

Since 75% of all the oil refined into gasoline,

has to be bough from foreign countries.

And we cannot do anything at all, about the price those countries sell oil for.

]]>